| Author |
Message |
|
|
 gmakerley
Community Mentor
Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 12330
Location: bloomfield, ct
50.03 Dollars($)
|
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 1:47 pm Post subject: New appraisal rules to be changed?? Some of us hope so
|
 Like 0
 Dislike 0
|
|
A bipartisan amendment approved on October 22 by the House Financial Services Committee could result in the elimination of the new and quite controversial appraisal system that was imposed by FNMA and FHLMC last spring.
The existing system came out of an agreement between New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the latter two's regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency. This new amendment would required the agency's director to replace the code with an improved set of rules developed through the regular administrative procedures and public comment periods used by all federal agencies.
What we've seen with this new system (HVCC - Home Valuation Code of Conduct) is a morass of difficulty. The code encourages lenders to use appraisal management companies, and some of these companies are owned by or affiliated with the lenders themselves.
This has resulted, in many cases, in payments to appraisers being much less than their standard fees, while borrowers are being charged an even higher fee. For example, a mangement firm might pay the appraiser $300 for a single family appraisal report, but charge $445 to the borrower. Guess where the $145 goes?
Supposedly, according to the management companies, the value they bring to this process is worth the expense. But realtors, home builders and appraisers, too, in some cases, say that the system is causing more harm than good. Because of drastic reductions in the fees paid to appraisers, what's happening is that the only appraisers willing to work for the new fee structure are less experienced, and often far removed from the location of the property being appraised.
We have a small group of appraisers who represent on MortgageFit. It would be nice to find out their feelings of the current system and the proposed changes, and it would be a delight if we could hear from more appraisers in general.
_________________
George M. Akerley
Independent Contractor - Mortgage Consultant
Word of Excellence Editing/Writing/Proofreading
860-221-5044
|
|
|
sara
Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 2645
Location: New Brunswick, New Jersey
488.43 Dollars($)
|
|
|
Jessica
Community Mentor
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 808
Location: OHIO
435.63 Dollars($)
|
|
|
carolrockman
Joined: 25 Oct 2009
Posts: 5
Location: Florida
2.44 Dollars($)
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:38 am Post subject:
|
Like 0
Dislike 0
|
|
Jessica,
You bring up an outstanding issue which I would like to comment on.
The use of BPOs (Broker Price Opinion) has increased expotentially and is used almost exclusively by Freddie to determine Sales Prices in the REO markets, which as we know, now comprises much of the United States, esp in high density metro areas where the most activity usually occurs. Appraisers, licensed to perform valuations are NOT being contracted to value these properties. Realtors, with limited, in some cases absolutely no training are being hired to set the market pricing via the cheaper BPO product. Is this fair to sellers or consumers.
However, for some strange reason, NAR does not see this as a conflict of interest? Realtors are competing for listings which they must surely hope to conclude as a closed sale = comission. Can they be relied upon to accurately value properties or could this activity be a contributory factor towards the overall slip in pricing. Would any price conscious buyer first consider the higher or lower priced REO? Increased volume/REO lower sales commissions would certainly compensate $$ earned in stable markets.
It is a catch 22 wherein Appraisers are then called in at contract phase to reconcile the values given by unlicensed/unqualified agents. in other words clean up the mess being created by the BPO price wars while also taking the blame for coming in at lower values.
In many areas of the country, the REO market, IS the market. Markets traditionally speak for themselves. Appraisers REPORT based upon historical data, they do not create the markets. Listing agents/Realtors involved in creating these sales cannot eschew their responsibility, their participation in creating the market.
The premises, some of the principles of the HVCC might change. When will the above referenced industry practices change is my question.
_________________
Best regards ~
Carol Rockman
786-581-9171
www.nvs.coop
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:02 am Post subject:
|
Like 0
Dislike 0
|
|
The problem is that the system is broken either way. I will agree that the HVCC has had its impact on the market and in many cases, negative. On the other hand, I have personally seen a huge decline in brokers, lenders, agents, etc, trying to place pressure on higher values. I recall just a few years ago, it was quite common for brokers or loan officers to contact appraisers, specifically asking for a target number, or my personal favorite, the broadcast emails saying that the appraiser that can get the highest value gets the order. They would also call after the appraisal was finished and try to argue for more value, many times threatening to withhold payment or future business if the appraiser was not willing to comply. And heaven forbid any appraiser to state something in the appraisal that was detrimental to the loan closing, like a leaking roof.
So yes, I do believe the HVCC has succeeded in its intent to insulate appraisers from those trying to place pressure on appraisers. But that doesn’t mean we don’t still have problems and these problems seem to come at a great expense to the consumer. The biggest problem is a lack of accountability throughout the industry.
I have been saying for years that we don’t need new legislation, no new rules, or the HVCC. We need an enforcement body to police the activities of the parties and the rules that are currently in place. Right now if there is a real problem with an appraisal, you can make a complaint to the state’s appraiser’s board, and then wait. A year later or more, there might be an investigation and a slap on the wrist for the appraiser, maybe a small fine. So what should an appraiser do? Here is a loan officer asking for $20,000 more on an appraisal or he will take his business somewhere else and there is nothing but a set of arbitrary and unenforced rules saying no. Think about it, who drives about 5-10 mph over the speed limit just because they know that police will not stop them in that range? But the law says you should drive below the speed limit! Well now let’s say you learn that the police only care about your speed if you get into an accident. So you can speed all you want until something bad happens. Well this is exactly what was happening with appraisers. We had no oversight until people started foreclosing and the lenders were losing money. Now they care?! Even the HVCC itself was supposed to have an enforcement body called the IVPI which still has not even been established!
As for the AMC’s, I do work with a couple of them that pay a decent fee and don’t hassle me too much. But my preferred clients are the large lenders that still order appraisals in house or on a rotation. They are often easier to work with, especially when some form of communication is required. A simple question could be a two day process through an AMC. And just to let you know George, in some metro areas, you can reverse your numbers. The AMC charges $445, pays the appraiser $145, and pockets the $300 for themselves. Not kidding! These are the AMC’s I refuse to work with, along with many appraisers I know.
The good news is that a mortgagee letter was released from HUD which changes the requirements for how the appraisal fee is shown on the HUD1 settlement statement. So now the appraisal fee on the HUD1 can only include the actual fee paid to the appraiser and any fees paid to the AMC for their services must be separated. This will force the AMC’s to compete based on their own price and not how much they can take from the appraiser’s split. This goes into effect January 1, 2010. On the other hand, as part of the same mortgagee letter, FHA has decided to adopt a set of rules similar to the HVCC as well, for those that are not in the know. So everyone that was relying on FHA to avoid the HVCC will no longer have that luxury.
I think the HVCC is here to stay at least in some form. Perhaps this bill will go through but I am sure that a different set of regulations will be established to replace it. Now I will admit, I have not actually read the bill yet, but I am curious to see how it is worded, especially since the HVCC is not a law and nothing more than a set of guidelines/business practices put in place by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The law could essentially pass but Fannie and Freddie could also still refuse to purchase any loan that does not comply with it. This has been my biggest beef all along. For all the groups trying to take action against the HVCC, you might be barking up the wrong tree by looking to congress.
_________________
Need help choosing the right loan? Get free consultation from community lenders/consultant |
|
|
apexoffice
Moderator
Joined: 09 Jul 2008
Posts: 192
Location: Atlanta, GA
55.87 Dollars($)
|
|
|
gmakerley
Community Mentor
Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 12330
Location: bloomfield, ct
50.03 Dollars($)
|
|
|
Jessica
Community Mentor
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 808
Location: OHIO
435.63 Dollars($)
|
|
|
USPAP MAN
Guest
|
|
|
riseabove
Joined: 09 Nov 2009
Posts: 277
11.01 Dollars($)
|
|
|
Residential guy
Guest
|
|
|
Mortgage Forums 
