| Author |
Message |
|
|
Donald Spruce
 Guest
|
|
|
gmakerley
 Community Mentor


Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 12376 Location: bloomfield, ct
58.49 Dollars($)
|
|
|
apexoffice
 Moderator
Joined: 09 Jul 2008
Posts: 193 Location: Atlanta, GA
56.04 Dollars($)
|
|
|
gmakerley
 Community Mentor


Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 12376 Location: bloomfield, ct
58.49 Dollars($)
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:48 pm Post subject:
|
Like 0
Dislike 0
|
|
locally, and of course everywhere else in this era of declining values, we've had the first go-round of frustrated homeowners bringing their cases to the assessor's office. what's being said is that the assessed values they're seeing (we are seeing) were based on values from 2007 and that the current market may or may not be similar, but that there's naught to be done about it. revaluation here occurs on a 10 year cycle, so the next one will be 2017.
i will recall that in 1996 i bought a condo (bank-owned) for $30000. that was a steal overall, but it was market-warranted at the time. my tax bill that year and for the first couple of years was about $3600 a year (crazy!). after reassessment, my tax bill was reduced to something like $700 a year. this, after the market had already turned and the condo was worth quite a bit more (not a huge amount though). by the time i sold it in 2006, my sales price was $175000, and the taxes hadn't changed other than a little bit due to mill rate increases...maybe to $850 or so - don't remember quite well enough.
but that's how these markets go....up and down, up and down...the taxes go with the market values. i don't think there's much hope arguing with assessed values in this climate, frankly; though i would certainly not tell people not to bother with it, either. _________________ George M. Akerley
Mortgage Underwriter/Consultant
Word of Excellence- Writing/Editing/Proofreading
860-221-5044
|
|
|
manny piceno
 Guest
|
|
|
gmakerley
 Community Mentor


Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 12376 Location: bloomfield, ct
58.49 Dollars($)
|
|
|