| Author |
Message |
|
|
gmakerley
 Community Mentor


Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 12376 Location: bloomfield, ct
58.49 Dollars($)
|
|
|
mgv456
 Guest
|
|
|
Guest

|
|
|
Alex from california !!!
 Guest
|
|
|
Jeff from Alexandra
 Guest
|
|
|
gmakerley
 Community Mentor


Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 12376 Location: bloomfield, ct
58.49 Dollars($)
|
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:07 am Post subject:
|
Like 0
Dislike 0
|
|
jeff, i don't follow your reasoning on the owner financing question at all. owenr financing entails holding the mortgage on a home that party a has sold to party b, with party a being the holder of the mortgage from that point on. party b is the new owner who then pays said mortgage. now i have to admit i am ignorant concerning the likelihood of an investment firm seeking out a private party who holds a loan note for the purpose of buying that note. perhaps that sort of transaction exists. for the sake of all of our sanity, i'll give you that one.
having said that, however, how would a right of first refusal for our buyer (party b) be relevant. this is not a lease-option we're discussing here, but an outright sale financed by the seller. if party b here had a right of first refusal, what woonce a buyer would that entitle him or her to? is it to purchase the mortgage note that is due and payable from party b? in other words, after having bought the note, party b would then begin to pay party b?
are you addressing a lease-option here or owner-financing? if it's the former, i can see some semblance of reality in your description, but i cannot, for the life of me, see any relevance if you're trying to describe owner-financing.
please fill me (us) in on the details. _________________ George M. Akerley
Mortgage Underwriter/Consultant
Word of Excellence- Writing/Editing/Proofreading
860-221-5044
|
|
|
Jeff from Alexandria
 Guest
|
|
|
Johnny Robledo
 Guest
|
|
|
eric1
 Community Expert


Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 1511
226.89 Dollars($)
|
|
|
guardman
 Guest
|
|
|
jenkin7

Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 4537 Location: Hawaii
728.43 Dollars($)
|
|
|
Kurt
 Guest
|
|
|
gmakerley
 Community Mentor


Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 12376 Location: bloomfield, ct
58.49 Dollars($)
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 9:43 am Post subject:
|
Like 0
Dislike 0
|
|
number 1 is a legal question best posed to an attorney with real estate expertise. i'll give you my opinion, nonetheless. i don't believe that a contract for deed would constitute a mortgage on the property at all - essentially, it's your promise to purchase and her promise to sell the home.
number 2: since all interest charged will be reported based on the social security number noted on the loan file, your sister will be getting the 1099. this, of course, is a question better asked of the irs or a tax advisor, neither of which i am. there may be a way in which you can get the benefit of the interest payments, but they'll be able to tell you far better than i.
number 3: inasmuch as your arrangement to purchase (i believe) isn't going to give you ownership at this time, i'd suggest that your sister's policy would remain in effect. of course, that's something that the insurance company would wish to know about, because as soon as she moves out, it is no longer a policy covering owner occupancy (hers). i'll defer to an insurance agent on this.
so...i have plenty of opinions, but the strongest held of those opinions are that you ought to take your questions straight to the authorities on these topics (lawyer, irs or tax advisor, insurance agent...in that order). _________________ George M. Akerley
Mortgage Underwriter/Consultant
Word of Excellence- Writing/Editing/Proofreading
860-221-5044
|
|
|
Jeffrho79
 Guest
|
|
|
jenkin7

Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 4537 Location: Hawaii
728.43 Dollars($)
|
|
|