Home arrow Mortgage Forums arrow Loan Talk for First Time Home Buyers arrow

FHA Loan vs. Rural Development Loan

Author Message
Guest









Post Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:42 pm    Post subject: FHA Loan vs. Rural Development Loan
Like 0
Dislike 0

I'm borrowing 130,000 for my first time home loan. I have been given the option of taking an FHA loan or a USDA rural development loan (since the home qualifies). From my understanding, the FHA requires 3.5% down in MI...the RD loan does not. Seems like a no brainer...right?

Is there any drawbacks to a rural development loan. Thank you.
Icon Mini Profile Realgeni





Joined: 13 Apr 2009

Posts: 1434

99.76 Dollars($)
Post Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 6:36 pm    Post subject:
Like 0
Dislike 0

They are, in fact, 2 different loans - one with the US Dept of Agriculture and the other with the Fed Housing Admin, or HUD.

Both programs are government programs. Only USDA goes to 100% and has no MIP or PMI.

- To be eligible for rural housing is based on geographic location.
-The cool part about Rural development is that if you have $100,000 purchase price but the appraisal came in for 103,000 you can have a loan amount of $103,000 and roll the $3,000 to the closing costs. That's the niche that RD has.
-And the underwriting actually is not much different from a regular FHA loan. Very similar.

General Program Requirements


In order to qualify for this benefit program, applicants must have very low-, low- or moderate incomes. Very low-income is defined as below 50 percent of the area median income (AMI); low-income is between 50 and 80 percent of AMI; moderate income is below 115 percent of AMI. Families must be without adequate housing, but able to afford the housing payments, including principal, interest, taxes, and insurance (PITI). Qualifying repayment ratios are 29 percent for PITI to 41 percent for total debt. In addition, applicants must be unable to obtain credit elsewhere, yet have an acceptable credit history. You must also be a US citizen or permanent resident
Icon Mini Profile dilipgagare





Joined: 26 Mar 2009

Posts: 58

0.01 Dollars($)
Post Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 8:54 am    Post subject:
Like 0
Dislike 0

Hi,
FHA or a USDA Loan both is good for who has low score.
Rural development has no down payment requirement or monthly mortgage insurance payments as opposed to FHA. USDA Loan is more better that FHA loan.
USDA is a better loan as it is 100% financing and no PMI, but it is generally easier to get a an FHA done, meaning FHA will take lower scores or worse credit,

Ihope you understand.

Regards
Dilip
Icon Mini Profile gmakerley
gmakerley
Community Mentor
Community Mentor

best lender badge

Joined: 09 Nov 2007

Posts: 12330
Location: bloomfield, ct
50.03 Dollars($)
Post Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 9:03 am    Post subject:
Like 0
Dislike 0

i think you'll find that rates are higher with usda than with fha loans. depending on your particular circumstances, that may make a difference. it's worth to price each product out, weigh the differences and see which makes more sense for you.
_________________
George M. Akerley
Independent Contractor - Mortgage Consultant
Word of Excellence Editing/Writing/Proofreading
860-221-5044
Quick Reply
Your Name
Subject
Image Verification


Can't read the image? click here to refresh
Message body

All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Highlights
Bookmark this page
Share |

Helpful References
Mortgage Guide
Mortgage Terms
Mortgage News
Book Center
Shop and Compare lenders
30 Yr. Fixed Vs. 5/1 ARM


Calculators     [View all]
Are you eligible for loan?
How much you can afford?
Calculate monthly payment
Calculate APR


Financial Tools
Credit Repair Tool New
Mortgage Planner
Simple Budgeting Tool


Our Community
MortgageFit Blog
Community Professionals
Community Rewards
Introduce yourself
Website tools


Community Rewards
Five simple ways to earn money with the Mortgage Community.

MortgageFit on Twitter

Followers (265)








Community Chat

We have chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution License to all works we publish. This work is licensed under cc by 2.0
Page loaded in 21.171 seconds.