What are you looking for? 

Foreclosure on some properties, able to keep others????

Author Message
Icon Mini Profile johnchiz



Joined: 21 Apr 2007

Posts: 1



1.75 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 10:28 pm    Post subject: Foreclosure on some properties, able to keep others????

I have 5 houses and 1 apartment building. I am over-extended. Did too much "Cash-out-Re-Fi" and I am in trouble. My own fault. Two places are upside down and I was declined a short sale and now either foreclosure or Deed in Lieu. But, is bankruptcy better? Or will "they" take everything else? Will they take the other properties? Or force sales of the remaining properties? Would like to keep the main house I live in......and maybe apartment building and one more house?!?!?? Please help, thanks..Johnchiz@gmail.com, 213-392-1564. Pasadena, CA.
 
image
Melinda

Guest







0.10 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:47 pm    Post subject:

In your situation bankruptcy is better. Because even if there are 2 properties ready for deed-in-lieu or foreclosure, you still have 4 other properties, out of which one is your primary home and it's better to keep it for yourself.

Though bankruptcy will make your score drop down considerably, yet I think if you want to start afresh, check with the bankruptcy attorney if you can file chapter 7.
 
image
Icon Mini Profile adonis
adonis


Joined: 22 Oct 2005



Posts: 1482
Location: ALASKA


142.78 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:18 am    Post subject:

Welcome John,

If a few of your properties are already into foreclosure, then you may file bankruptcy to stop the process at least for a while if it Chapter 7 that you have filed.

Read more from a previous community discussion on the topic Should anyone file bankruptcy to avoid foreclosure.

_________________
Procrastination is the enemy of your financial sucess
 
image
Guest









0.10 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:26 am    Post subject:

Hmmmm.....I thought that bankrupcty only allows a person to live in safety for two years THEN the creditors can go after any equity to satisfy unpaid debts. Also - Deed in Lieu may be looked at as a "Gift" from the lender and therefore be a tax liability. So---maybe just allow forclosure on the upside down properties, suffer the credit consequences and continue to make payments on personal house?!?!? Cheers for now!
 
image
Guest









0.10 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:28 am    Post subject:

Maybe bankrupcty not the best option. Allowing foreclosure on upside down stuff then pay the others seems more viable?!?!?!?!
 
image
Icon Mini Profile sara
sara


Joined: 05 Jul 2006

Posts: 1206
Location: New Brunswick, New Jersey


223.95 Dollars($)

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:13 am    Post subject: RE: foreclosure better than bankruptcy

Hi Johnchiz,

It is better to let your properties be foreclosed; even better would be to do a short sale or a deed-in-lieu as these will have less impact on your credit score. But try to avoid filing a bankruptcy as it ruins the credit entirely and it takes much more time to recover from a bad credit history along with bankruptcy tied to it.

Take care
 
image
Quick Reply
Your Name
Subject
Message body

All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Highlights
Helpful References
Mortgage Guide
Mortgage Terms
Mortgage News
Book Center
Shop and Compare lenders
30 Yr. Fixed Vs. 5/1 ARM


Calculators     [View all]
Are you eligible for loan?
How much you can afford?
Calculate monthly payment
Calculate APR


Financial Tools
Credit Repair Tool
Mortgage Planner
Simple Budgeting Tool


Community Rewards
Five simple ways to earn money with the Mortgage Community.

MortgageFit Live Help

Explore the lender near you

Google Map Image

MF Talk

 
About Us  | Contact Us  | Our Blog  | Privacy Policy  | Testimonials  | Website Tools  | RSS Feeds  | Site Map 
We have chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution License to all works we publish.
This work is licensed under cc by 2.0