| Author |
Message |
|
|
Amy
 Guest
|
|
|
Phoenix
 Guest
|
|
|
Cheri
 Guest
|
|
|
REOMA
 Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:27 pm Post subject: Ibanez
|
Like 0
Dislike 0
|
|
Phoenix;
Here's my understanding. Judge Long ruled that a number of FCs aren't valid. As a result the title insurance companies aren't writing NEW policies on any properties that are impacted. That's made the properties more or less unsalable and resulted in the need to reforeclose. In your case the property has already been sold. Hence, you're the owner of record, although there may be a cloud on the title. The ruling does NOT require the bank reforeclose on your property. In the event you try to sell, the title companies have indicated they'll "insure over" the existing title cloud. The channel 56 story of the party that couldn't sell doesn't seem to agree with other information within the industry. They can't reforeclose on you since you're not in default and are the current owner of record. Although your title may be flawed, you're not in default. Your current policy holder has 2 options if you sell; Pay the claim or re-insure the next buyer. Based on the magnitude of the issue, they'll be reinsuring. Even if you didn't buy the insurance for yourself, the title companies would defend since your lender, who you did insure, has the most to use. The parties I'm seeing bitten the most are the cash investors that didn't buy title insurance. They have noone to turn to. Now my caveat...this is JUST my understanding, NOT a legal opinion since I'm not an attorney. There may well be other issues present here I'm not aware of. Speak to an attorney for legal advise. _________________ Need help choosing the right loan? Get free consultation from community lenders/consultant |
|
|
gmorin
 Guest
|
|
|
gina
 Guest
|
|
|
Blown Away
 Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:00 pm Post subject:
|
Like 0
Dislike 0
|
|
I also called today....didnt get that message but got one that said if calling about it, its been submitted no further information.
It is a shame that this decision has become our lifeline, isnt it!?
I dont think the Judge understands the "undoing" he has ahead of him. I wish some higher ups would provide some guidance to him. The impact will be felt for years, I am not sure either outcome is valid under our laws, either way he decides there is another law in place that will be impacted.
I, for one, have gone with the extension, we have found two other home that meet our criteria, funny thing is they are asking 70K more than what we were locked into for the "ibanez home". WOW, speed that economy right up, I am just keeping my fingers crossed that someone accepts one of our offers and that it doesnt take a year to close.
Again....frustrated... |
|
|
Peter Cooney
 Guest
|
|
|
Blown Away
 Guest
|
|
|
gmorin
 Guest
|
|
|
gmorin
 Guest
|
|
|
Peter Cooney
 Guest
|
|
|
REOMA
 Guest
|
|
|
Cheri
 Guest
|
|
|
BL
 Guest
|
|
|