| Author |
Message |
|
|
TLN1011
 Guest
|
|
|
smithsussane

Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Posts: 10439 Location: Alaska
985.83 Dollars($)
|
|
|
gmakerley
 Community Mentor


Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 12376 Location: bloomfield, ct
58.49 Dollars($)
|
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:26 am Post subject:
|
Like 0
Dislike 0
|
|
sussane...she said she wasn't even at the closing. consequently, she cannot be a party to any of the mortgage documents. nonetheless, this is problematic.
i wonder how the bank was able to properly document its mortgage without her signature on the mortgage deed. in order for a foreclosure action to take place in a case like this, they've got to go through some extraordinary hoops to prove their case. if the mortgage itself (not the loan) is only in one name, but the property was vested in both names, then their suit against TLN is going to be fruitless.
and, of course, TLN indicated that she was removed from title subsequent to the date of the mortgage, but prior to the default in payments.
TLN, i hope you have a lawyer working for you - a real estate lawyer - because someone has to be able to navigate through this mess for you. you certainly cannot do it on your own. _________________ George M. Akerley
Mortgage Underwriter/Consultant
Word of Excellence- Writing/Editing/Proofreading
860-221-5044
|
|
|