| Author |
Message |
|
|
murdenBb

Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 1
1.32 Dollars($)
|
|
|
chrisgummerson
 Community Expert

Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 704 Location: La Palma, CA
9.98 Dollars($)
|
|
|
keyonline
 Guest
|
|
|
Guest

|
|
|
gmakerley
 Community Mentor


Joined: 09 Nov 2007
Posts: 12376 Location: bloomfield, ct
58.49 Dollars($)
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2011 7:13 am Post subject:
|
Like 0
Dislike 0
|
|
I don't comprehend what I'm seeing here in large part. When a lender files a foreclosure suit on a property, that means they're suing you. In this case, you cite a dwelling that no longer exists. Since you're already being sued for foreclosure, I cannot conceive of a rationale for the lender to file a separate lawsuit because the dwelling has been demolished. Assuming they do, and obtain a judgment, how do they enforce that judgment? This is all so convoluted that my head is spinning at the moment. I feel like Linda Blair.
Fortunately, I don't look like her - at least from the role she played.
The lender is foreclosing on the property, whether or not there's a dwelling in place. I'd have to surmise that they have an inkling that there's only raw land left by now. To have begun the foreclosure process, they'd want to bring themselves up to speed on the condition of their collateral - unless they're off in another universe too.
Why not simply call them up and suggest that they investigate precisely what it is that they're attempting to foreclose on? I know it's not pleasant speaking with your lender once they begin looking for past-due payments, but they might actually be appreciative of your concern for their well-being (not that it'll get you anything). _________________ George M. Akerley
Mortgage Underwriter/Consultant
Word of Excellence- Writing/Editing/Proofreading
860-221-5044
|
|
|