| Author |
Message |
|
|
Mr. Allen Farris
 Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:06 am Post subject: Can we be sued by my Mortgage Broker?
|
Like 0
Dislike 0
|
|
Hello,
My wife and I used a Mortgage Broker to get pre approved thru, we then contracted on the home and signed the papers to get the loan stated. We paid for an appraisal and he sent us a Commitment Letter after he got us approved and locked in the rate.
However, our realtor said that we may be able to get a lower rate with her lender, so we applied with her Mortgage Broker who beat the 1st Mortgage Broker's rate, so we decided to go with the lower rate Broker.
Well, you would have thought we commited a mortal sin! Granted, we should have told the other broker we found a better deal, but he is telling us we owe him $5,375.00 of a Brokerage Fee.
Are we legally resonsible to pay this fee to him? He has retained an attorney and plan to take us to court!
What can we do????? HELP!!!!!! _________________ Need help choosing the right loan? Get free consultation from community lenders/consultant |
|
|
eric1
 Community Expert


Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 1511
226.89 Dollars($)
|
|
|
Mr. Allen Farris
 Guest
|
|
|
Niicss

Joined: 03 Oct 2005
Posts: 4770 Location: New Jersey
499.28 Dollars($)
|
|
|
raymond
 Community Expert


Joined: 03 Jul 2009
Posts: 1166 Location: Irvine, California
24.79 Dollars($)
|
|
|
Mr. Man
 Guest
|
|
|
raymond
 Community Expert


Joined: 03 Jul 2009
Posts: 1166 Location: Irvine, California
24.79 Dollars($)
|
|
|
Mr. Man
 Guest
|
|
|
raymond
 Community Expert


Joined: 03 Jul 2009
Posts: 1166 Location: Irvine, California
24.79 Dollars($)
|
|
|
jveenstra
 Community Expert


Joined: 10 Nov 2008
Posts: 1256 Location: River Edge, New Jersey
264.15 Dollars($)
|
|
|
Mr. Man
 Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:13 am Post subject:
|
Like 0
Dislike 0
|
|
Raymond and John,
You both are unbelievable in how you are trying to make the loan person out to be the bad person here because they are demanding payment of an earned broker fee from a contractual obligation that the client agreed to!
If the broker had the borrower approved and locked and stood ready willing and able to deliver the rate, terms and costs agreed to in the broker contract, and if that broker contract said that if the borrower defaults on the contract that they agreed to pay the brokerage fee, then why on earth would you say it's wrong for the broker to demand payment?
RESPA is in place to protect consumers, NOT to be used as a tool to steal from mortgage professionals who have a valid contract and are suffering from Default of contract by the borrower. RESPA is not a license to use and abuse mortgage professionals!
I'll bet it's safe to say that neither one of you have ever actually enforced a contract in court, because if you had and done everything correctly, you would find that the courts would side with the broker.
Please educate the forum and tell us exacly where to see the RESPA rules that says it's illigal to demand payment of a broker fee after a loan commitment has been obtained under the terms and conditions set forth in the contract that was signed and agreed to by the borrower. (NOT including a refinance of a Primary Residence)
Come on, show the forum how smart you both are and exactly what you know! Let's see you put some facts with your statements to the forum!
Or, or, or could it be, you really don't know what you are talking about, so you try to scare everyone with throwing things around like RESPA, SAFE Act, etc. to give the illusion that you do?
The forum is waiting on your responses.................... |
|
|
NY Joe
 Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:55 am Post subject:
|
Like 0
Dislike 0
|
|
Mr. Man,
You are absolutly correct, respa is not saying a broker's contract is completely unenforceable, they are simply making sure the consumer does not get done wrong. As most brokers, it's been my experience that the consumer is 5 times more likely to do the mortgage broker wrong than the other way around, especially these days.
If the broker that the borrower is talking about in the initial post had offer and acceptance of contract, obtained a commitment at the same rate, program and costs quoted, then they deserve to be paid what was agreed to in the contract. Granted, it's the borrower's right to switch lenders at any time, however, it does not release them for any contractual obligations they have prior.
What level headed, honest and decent person would dispute this? Only a dishonest, underhanded person would disagree.
These two guys, Raymond and John are wrong and they will respond without any hard facts from any respa guidelines, if they respond at all.
Here's a question for Raymond and John, what about an Exclusive Buyer's Agent Agreement, can a realtor enforce that contract? Can a realtor demand their fee after they work with a buyer for a month, showing them 20 homes and get a contract on a home only to have the buyer try to bring in another realtor right before closing that will rebate them back money?
Tell the forum your thought Raymond and John. |
|
|
NY Joe
 Guest
|
|
|
Mr. man
 Guest
|
|
|
Mr. Man
 Guest
|
|
|